Why The Journal Should Publish It

Journals that are not members of ICMJE are urged to follow the same guideline.31When submitting a paper, authors should fully disclose to editors all posting of results of the submitted work or closely related work in registries. When deciding whether to consider a trial report for publication, journal editors may review the study’s data fields to ensure that they are complete and informative. In medical publishing, authors are usually expected to assign copyright to the journal publishing their study. Assignment of copyright is a legal document in which the authors assign certain rights to the publisher.

Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics. ODJFS-regulated child care programs do not need to be participating in PFCC to be eligible to apply for these sub-grants; however, ODE programs must be approved to provide PFCC at the time of application. Ten percent of the funds will be used to develop efforts in support of services for child care programs and the children receiving care. To support and encourage scientific exchange between Society members, authors in or outside the field of neuroimmune therapeutics, and reaching into an international field of investigators that span the globe. Even if Western publishers and rankers are hesitant to cut Russia off, Moscow appears to be moving away from international journals regardless. The status of each bill, resolution, proclamation, and memorial is updated when the offices of the Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Clerk of the House publish the un-official daily journals and should not be deemed official.

Welch compiled the information below to help guide a researcher through the decision-making process. Make room for sustained intellectual and analytical engagement with quoted material. It is the author’s job to take the reader through the implications of the passage/case at hand and to relate it to the developing argument. Don’t be afraid to slow down and dig deep into the primary or secondary material. Take some time before even writing your paper to think about the logic of the presentation. When writing, focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than the chronological order of the experiments that you did.

But high profile journals do have longer wait times, mostly because of the volume of submissions they receive, and their rejection rates are also higher. Good journals take a minimum of four months to come back to you with a response if your paper has been sent for a peer review. If your paper has been rejected, you should hear about it within 4–6 weeks after submission.

It is at the discretion of the editors whether publication of such related material prevents publication in the journal. The editorial staff are committed to maintaining high standards of integrity of the published scientific record. Journal staff undertake routine image analysis of data in manuscripts submitted for publication and will request source data and an author response to image aberrations.

Although many journals produced by professional Societies have used a mixed funding model, with page-charges in concert with subscription fees. SLACK Incorporated has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service to offer a fast and convenient way for authors to pay publication charges. References must adhere to the style specified in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th edition . Authors are responsible for the accuracy of references, particularly author names and page numbers. References should focus on the most recent and relevant literature, except for classic publications, and keep as close as possible to a maximum of 50. Manuscript titles should be concise, specific, and informative, and contain the key points of the work.

For further information on figure legend formatting, please see the AMA Manual of Style. Save each table in a separate word processing document file and upload inCreativeVietnam dually. Authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the references.

Not paying attention to it is one of the main causes of rejection of an article, giving a view that the submitter does not know the journal or has not taken its focus and identity very seriously. Users will be solely liable for any damage resulting from any infringement of copyrights, proprietary rights or any other harm resulting from such a submission. The User’s personal data is processed by the Journal on the legal basis corresponding to Article 6, paragraph 1, letters a, b, c and f. Of the General Data Protection Regulation and will be used for the purpose of Journal’s services in accordance with the present Terms and Use, as well as in those cases expressly stated by the legislation. The publication services to the Journal are provided byPensoft Publishers Ltd., through its publishing platform ARPHA, hereinafter referred to as “the Provider”. Retraction should happen after a careful consideration by the Journal editors of allegations coming from the editors, authors, or readers.

It will be formally adopted, once all languages are available, for scrutiny by co-legislators. Morgan Trau is a political reporter and multimedia journalist based out of the WEWS Columbus Bureau. Mexican philosophy is a philosophical tradition rooted in and framed by the history, geography, culture, and experience of Mexico and its people. Its Mexican profile is reflected in its texts and propositions and lends it a difference that both reflects an unmistakable European inheritance and simultaneously sets it apart from it.

Once logged in, you will find the online submission system either by clicking the “Submit manuscript” button. There is increasing frustration amongst OA advocates, with what is perceived as resistance to change on the part of many of the established academic publishers. Publishers are often accused of capturing and monetising publicly-funded research, using free academic labour for peer review, and then selling the resulting publications back to academia at inflated profits.

Reviews resulting of this process will be used as a basis for the final decision on the manuscript’s publication. In order to publish in a scientific journal, it is necessary to start with an honesty exercise regarding the level of the manuscript to be submitted. In recent years, the pressure to publish in high impact journals has generated many situations that have nothing to do with the spirit of science and quality publication.

Files should be named based on manuscript number, file type and sequence position as in the following examples. Your Manuscript ID can be seen at the top of the page when you begin submission. Use the nomenclature Figure EV1 for the figure legends and making reference to the figures in the text. Please use this format for figures/tables/text beyond the limitations set of the main manuscript and Expanded View .

The handling Editor’s name is also made public on the published article, acknowledging their contribution. Along with your revisions to the manuscript, you should prepare an anonymous memorandum addressed to the editors and reviewers. This memo should be included at the top of the electronic file of your revised manuscript. The memo should address the concerns raised by the different reviewers and detail the changes made in the manuscript in response. Information that you do not care to make available to the reviewers should be included in the text “Comments to the Editors” box that is available when you submit the manuscript online. Manuscripts submitted to The Journal of Politics, including any online appendix content, should follow the guidelines provided in The JOP Style Guide.

When you see some articles that are relevant, use the Publication filter to see which journals they’re from. Then take a closer look at those journals to see if their aims and scope fit your subject and if respected researchers in your field are publishing there. Editorial staff or editors shall not be involved in processing their own academic work. Submissions authored by editorial staff/editors will be assigned to at least two independent outside reviewers. Decisions will be made by other Editorial Board Members who do not have a conflict of interest with the author.

Clinical trial reports should include the power of the study design. For line figures, the lines should be solid, the text in a standard font and not blurred, and the overall image should be sharp and clear. Avoid using tints if possible; if they are essential to the understanding of the figure, try to make them coarse.

For previously characterized antibodies, a citation must be provided. The display of cropped gels and blots in the main paper is permitted if it improves the clarity and conciseness of the presentation. Cropped gels in the paper must retain all important bands, and space (several band-widths) should be retained above and below the relevant band. Vertically sliced images that juxtapose lanes that were non-adjacent in the gel must have a clear separation or a black line delineating the boundary between the gels. QuanCreativeVietnam tive comparisons between samples on different gels/blots are discouraged; if this is unavoidable, the figure legend must state that the samples derive from the same experiment and that gels/blots were processed in parallel.

It is at the discretion of the editors whether prior publication of such related material prevents subsequent publication in the journal. Corrigenda involving figure corrections are subject to the journal’s policy on the data integrity. In the case of a figure correction, the journal will review all figures in the paper to screen for any additional issues. The journal reserves the right to request and publish source data with corrigenda. In rare cases the journal may consider data from an alternate and compelling dataset that was produced at the same time as the original data. When journal staff detect potential aberrations in image-based data, the severity is classified according to a three-tiered system.

The Cover Letter must include contact information[affiliation, postal address, e-mail address, telephone number] for all authors. Authors should indicate aCorresponding Author for correspondence during the submission and revision process. In the Letter, authors must confirm that the manuscript has been submitted solely to this journal and is not published, in press, or submitted elsewhere . Authors must confirm that all the research meets the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements of the study country. Authors must confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.

Such frustrations sometimes spill over into hyperbole, of which “publishers add no value” is one of the most common examples. The online distribution of inCreativeVietnam dual articles and academic journals then takes place without charge to readers and libraries. Most open access journals remove all the financial, technical, and legal barriers that limit access to academic materials to paying customers. The Public Library of Science and BioMed Central are prominent examples of this model. Most established academic disciplines have their own journals and other outlets for publication, although many academic journals are somewhat interdisciplinary, and publish work from several distinct fields or subfields. There is also a tendency for existing journals to CreativeVietnam de into specialized sections as the field itself becomes more specialized.

Hindawi supports the deposition of manuscripts in preprint servers, and does not consider this to compromise the novelty of the results. Articles based on content previously made public only on a preprint server, institutional repository, or in a thesis will be considered. In the spirit of sharing findings through our open science mission, emphasis is not placed on novelty, interest, or perceived impact. Replication studies, particularly of research published in this journal, are encouraged. We have partnered with a number of leading author services providers to offer our authors an exclusive 10% discount on a wide range of manuscript preparation and post-publication services.

Not only will you have more clarity about your path in life, but journaling improves your ability to make small and large decisions along the way. On the pages of your journal will be the future world you are creating for yourself. You are the author of your life’s story. You deserve to be happy.

Consider journals that you’ve already used as sources in your literature review or bibliography. Next, consider journals that are cited in the reference lists and bibliographies of these scholarly articles or reports. These sources may already have a related focus with your topic area.

  • You can have the perfect paper yet struggle with your options and the submission system can be a mess.
  • The Authors retain full ownership to their content published in the Journal.
  • If the editors find that this is not the case, the manuscript is withdrawn and will not be considered further.
  • There are some details in a grown child’s life that no parent is meant to know, especially when that grown child has the kind of early adult pastimes that I had.

Informed consent for this purpose requires that an identifiable patient be shown the manuscript to be published. Authors should disclose to these patients whether any potential identifiable material might be available via the Internet as well as in print after publication. Tell researchers that you have a journal and are willing to publish anything as long as the authors pay. The work does not even need to meet any standards; it does not require peer-review. As long as the authors pay $2000-$3000, the publisher will be delighted to post your work on a website. In 2014 there was an estimated 28,100 active scientific journals, but while the large majority of these journals are highly respected, there has also been a sharp rise in the number of predatory journals.

Editors should remind authors that they should avoid nominating peer reviewers who have a conflict of interest. Editors are under no obligation to accept the authors’ nominations and it is advisable to ensure at least one peer reviewer not suggested by the authors reviews the paper. Editors should check the qualifications of all reviewers before issuing and invitation to review. It is especially important to verify the qualifications of potential reviewers who have been recommended by authors. Editors’ decisions about whether to publish inCreativeVietnam dual manuscripts submitted to their journal should not be influenced by pressure from the editor’s employer, the journal owner, or the publisher.

Unless agreed differently, the papers, as well as contributions, become the legal copyright of the journal so that the dispersion and proper use of them are facilitated. Authors should refer to ideas and findings of other authors of by proper citing of literature, referencing, such as using clear indented text or quotation marks and using APA style formatting. The first thing to point out is that there’s a good chance your fears are at least somewhat exaggerated. As I noted at the outset of this post, I was initially a bit apprehensive about the impact that taking a principled stand would have on my own career, but I can’t say that I perceive any real cost to my decision, nearly five years on. One way you can easily see this is to observe that most people are surprised when I first tell them I haven’t published in Elsevier journals in five years.

Then you’re ready to write your cover letter and submit your manuscript. We encourage our authors to follow the ‘Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER – guidelines’ and to include sex and gender considerations where relevant. Authors should use the terms sex and gender carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms. Article titles and/or abstracts should indicate clearly what sex the study applies to. If a sex and/or gender analysis was not conducted, the rationale should be given in the Discussion. We suggest that our authors consult the full guidelines before submission.

Discounts are also offered to our editors and reviewers, for more information see here. Please note that the charges below are applicable for all manuscripts submitted after 1st of February 2022. Rapid publication process, normally within 1-2 weeks time after a manuscript is accepted for publication. Should you have any problems in providing the figures in one of the above formats, please contact They should be quoted in the text as personal observations, personal communications, or unpublished data, specifying the exact source, with date, if possible.

Opinion: It’s time for the academic paywall to fall – Varsity

Opinion: It’s time for the academic paywall to fall.

Posted: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 01:49:38 GMT [source]

The journal publishes Reviews that balance interest for the general reader with usefulness for specialists. When commissioning or assessing Reviews, the editors focus on articles that report the latest developments and newest insights in a given field and set them in a wider context. Any information published in the journal should represent a substantial, novel contribution to the scientific record.

This page also outlines our editorial policies on prior publication, data and correction and retraction. Should a dispute arise regarding the rejection of a manuscript, the authors may rebut the decision and trigger an arbitration. The Specialty Chief Editor may, nevertheless, override the handling Editor’s recommendation and decide that the manuscript deserves being reviewed before a final decision is made. In this case he/she will assign the manuscript to a new handling Editor for another assessment. Peer-reviewed publication provides evidence that helps in the evaluation of merit of research funding requests. The act of putting your research to paper will help you clarify your goals for the research, will help you in reviewing and interpreting your own data and force you to compare your work with that of others.

Commentary: The publication pandemic – Physics Today

Commentary: The publication pandemic.

Posted: Wed, 26 May 2021 07:00:00 GMT [source]

If you would like to publish your research on an open access basis, you can find out more here. “What we are seeing in Life Sciences, as well as other journals, is the explosive growth of new technology which has broad implications on these studies,” he said. The insight is useful to people who make decisions, particularly long-term organizational decisions or, in our particular field, family decisions. It provides insight into an important issue – for example, by explaining a wide variance when numbers are spread out from the mean or expected value, or by shedding light on an unsolved problem that affects a lot of people. In order to inform its work on the action plan, including on the EU taxonomy, the European Commission established a Technical Expert Group on sustainable finance in July 2018. On 6 July 2021, the Delegated Act supplementing Article 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation was adopted by the Commission for scrutiny by the colegislators.

We set no time limit for notifying errors or publishing corrections. You can contact our Editorial Staff at Our team will be able to provide advice and quotations for supplements. About unethical publication practice, we follow the guidelines onGood Publication Practiceas reported inCOPEandCouncil of Science Editors. Sequence variants should be described in the text and tables using both DNA and protein designations whenever appropriate. Sequence variant nomenclature must follow the current HGVS guidelines in which some examples of acceptable nomenclature are provided. Figure and table legends must be able to stand alone in the text and thus full descriptive legends for all figures and tables should be supplied.

In clinical trials, data on withdrawals and dropouts should also be reported disaggregated by sex. The authors are not under any obligation to pay if they withdraw the manuscript before receiving the first decision. The author/s who withdraw after receiving the first decision must pay 50% of the APC as a withdrawal fee. If pursuing the ethical approval was not necessary for the study , authors are still required to declare the reasons. We will re-send article metadata to abstracting and indexing services such as Scopus and Web of Science, although we acknowledge that we are not able to enforce replacement of the metadata on their platforms. We will not usually publish a correction that does not affect the contribution in a material way or if the issue does not significantly impair the reader’s understanding of the contribution, such as a spelling mistake or grammatical error.

Both editors at this point will additionally make notes for items to be followed-up on at later stages. The publication process involves finding a careful balance for when each check occurs. Once a paper passes the first check, an editor with subject expertise assesses the paper and determines whether it is within the journal’s scope and if it could potentially meet the required publication criteria. While there may be requests for further information and minor edits from the author as needed, the paper will either be desk rejected by the editor or allowed to proceed to peer review. So when I conceived of this article, I thought it would be useful to reach beyond my own observations.

To advance actively developing fields of research in neuroimmune pharmacology (including but not limited to nano-medicine, therapeutics, technology, and gene editing). If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Publishers sell Russian universities journal subscriptions, but it is unclear if this can continue given western sanctions, Sutton said. STM is currently speaking to its legal counsel and sanctions experts. European governments including Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden have already stopped joint research projects with Russia in retaliation for the invasion of Ukraine.

Journal Citation Reports lists the rankings of more than 8400 journals. You can use it to check JIF, which is calculated by CreativeVietnam ding the total number of articles by their annual number of citations. The immediacy index shows the average citations in the first year of publication, which gives an idea about the popularity of a particular field. Some publishing practices by high IF journals add more to this debate. Review articles, for example, are known to get higher citations than research articles. As a result, many journals publish more review articles that help them maintain a higher JIF for years, without having to publish any solid research articles for a long time.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. A good academic idea is complemented by clear writing that makes the research easy to understand by different types of readership. Make sure the introduction of your paper is clear and makes a compelling statement of the academic article’s purpose and research questions that will be approached. Find out more on the general conventions of academic writing for a high quality research paper. The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note.